ArticlePloS one2025
An E-Delphi study to facilitate animal welfare assessment in Italian zoos and aquaria.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Selection of Animal Welfare Indicators for Primates in Rescue Centres Using the Delphi Method:Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Wildlife management and conservation in South Africa: informing legislative reform through expert consultation using the Policy Delphi methodology.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ensuring animal welfare is a key aspect of animal management in zoological facilities and aquaria, representing a pivotal facet of their mission. Italy currently lacks a comprehensive and valuable assessment methodology for evaluating the welfare of captive animals. To address this gap, the present study aimed to identify the most important criteria that should be considered in the welfare management and assessment of animals housed in Italian zoos and aquaria. To pinpoint this issue, we engaged experts with diverse backgrounds, structuring their communication throughout an iterative process, by applying the Delphi methodology. A pilot and three Delphi rounds were administered online to 74 experts, asking them to a) validate relevant topics derived from current legislation and guidelines divided into three clusters: Care, Wellbeing, and Regulation; b) assess the relevance of these topics across taxonomic groups; c) propose and confirm indicators for each identified topic; d) suggest and refine a list of questions for animal welfare assessment. The results were three lists of questions, one for each cluster, with a total of 80 topics, 174 indicators, and 272 questions identified by the experts. The aspects included in these lists offer valuable insights into the main aspects experts consider relevant for captive animal welfare. Despite the complexity of animal welfare and the huge amount of species hosted in zoos limiting the possibility to cover this aspect with a single expert consultation, this project actively addresses the urgent need for standardization in animal welfare assessment, contributing to the ongoing development of zoological regulations in Italy. This is especially important given the current limited legislative framework, underscoring the link between animal welfare and successful ex-situ species conservation. These questions can be the basis of fine-tuned protocols to be tested in future projects aiming at animal welfare self-assessment, thus supporting authority inspection processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.