SynthesisExperimental physiology2026
Respiratory muscle endurance training among patients with chronic diseases: A systematic review of available evidence.
Synthesis in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Respiratory muscle endurance training among patients with chronic diseases: A systematic review of available evidence.Experimental physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Experimental Physiology Special Issue: Exercise as Medicine.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review summarizes the available evidence on respiratory muscle endurance training involving voluntary isocapnic hyperpnoea among patients with chronic diseases. It includes both randomized and non-randomized controlled trials implementing this exercise training modality performed either alone or in combination with other interventions. It was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Cochrane and ReeDOC. It was drafted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The final analysis was conducted on 12 studies (n = 257). There was heterogeneity in participants, training modalities and comparators used. The underpowered level of evidence is attributable to the lack of robustness of the original studies, including a lack of description of the intervention, lack of blinding, and missing data. Respiratory muscle endurance training is an exercise training modality that is both safe and feasible, even in the setting of the patient's home. It increases respiratory endurance time. However, its effect on peak oxygen consumption at exercise, maximal work rate, 6-min walking distance, quality of life, dyspnoea and fatigue remains to be confirmed. In conclusion, this systematic review shows that respiratory muscle endurance training increases respiratory endurance among patients with chronic diseases. The populations that benefit the most and the mechanisms involved remain to be investigated. Further high-quality studies are needed to understand its role, whether it is performed alone or as an add-on modality to usual pulmonary rehabilitation programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.