SynthesisPloS one2025
Pain management practice and associated factors among nurses working in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insights Into Tertiary Care Nurses: Awareness and Practices Regarding Nonpharmacological Pediatric Pain Management in Qatar.Paediatric & neonatal pain · 2025Article
- A Sociological Framework for Improving Palliative Pain Care in Low-Resource Nations.Current pain and headache reports · 2025Review
- Pain Assessment Practice and Associated Factors Among Nurses Working in Public Hospitals of West Hararge Zone, Eastern Ethiopia, 2023.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPain management is a crucial component of patient care that promotes relaxation, lowers complications, improves quality of life, and shortens hospital stays. Several studies assessed the nurses' pain management practices in Ethiopia. However, the findings of these studies are highly variable and inconsistent. Therefore, the study aims to determine the overall prevalence of pain management practice and associated factors among nurses working in Ethiopia.
methodThe study included all observational quantitative research articles conducted among nurses in Ethiopia. We used Google Scholar, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus searching databases. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to check the study quality. Then I2 statistics and Cochran's Q test were used to evaluate heterogeneity. The Funnel, Egger's test, and non-parametric trim and fill effect tests were used to check publication bias by using a random effect model. Finally, we conducted subgroup analysis and sensitivity tests to evaluate statistical heterogeneity and the presence or absence of any influential study.
resultIn the final analysis, we included eighteen studies, and 4,213 nurses participated. The overall pooled prevalence of nurses with good pain management practice was 43.79% (95% CI: 38.52, 49.06%). In-service training AOR; 95% CI 3.21 (1.87, 4.54), good knowledge AOR; 95% CI 2.44 (1.78, 3.09), positive attitudes AOR; 95% CI 2.84 (1.24, 4.44), and pain management guidelines in health facilities AOR; 95% CI 3.46 (1.48, 5.44) were the significant associated factors with pain management practice among nurses in Ethiopia.
conclusionThis study found that over half of Ethiopian nurses had poor pain management practices. Knowledge, attitude, training, and pain management guidelines in health facilities were significant factors. Therefore, health managers and stakeholders should prioritize pain management awareness, attitudes, availability of guidelines, and in-service training to improve patient care and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.