Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39761243›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Determining the perceptions and practices of oncologists regarding venous thromboembolism risk assessment in ambulatory cancer patients: A qualitative study.

Marwa Akram Tariq, Ehab Mudher Mikhael

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marwa Akram TariqDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Al-Diwaniyah, Iraq.
Ehab Mudher MikhaelDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0002-6341-4978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) can increase morbidity and mortality for cancer patients. Therefore, guidelines recommend predicting VTE risk and thromboprophylaxis for high-risk patients. Many studies critique oncologists' adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines for cancer patients. Meanwhile, most of these studies did not discuss in detail the reasons and facilitators for oncologists' adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines. Therefore, the current study aimed to explore in depth the perceptions and practices of oncologists working in oncology centers in Baghdad, Iraq, regarding VTE and its risk assessment among ambulatory cancer patients. A qualitative study with face-to-face individual-based interviews was conducted with oncologists working in four major oncology centers in Baghdad, Iraq using a semi-structured interview guide. The guide was developed based on previous relevant literature and validated by a panel of experts. The interviews were conducted from November 2023 to January 2024. Thematic analysis approach was used for data analysis. Thirty-one oncologists were interviewed in this study. Twenty-two of the interviewed oncologists reported that they detect VTE among their cancer patients. 64% of participating oncologists reported that they did not conduct VTE risk assessments for their cancer patients. Only four oncologists reported assessing VTE risk using the Khorana score. 58% of oncologists reported that they prescribe thromboprophylaxis for high-risk patients; meanwhile, only 11% of them reported prescribing anticoagulants in a dose similar to that reported by thromboprophylaxis guidelines. 77% of participating oncologists reported that pharmacists have a significant role in preventing cancer-related thrombosis by helping physicians prescribe a safe and effective prophylactic anticoagulant and in calculating VTE risk scores. In conclusion, CAT is commonly diagnosed among Iraqi cancer patients. VTE risk assessment for ambulatory cancer patients is rarely conducted by oncologists working at Oncology centers in Baghdad, Iraq. The prophylactic anticoagulants were rarely prescribed in appropriate dose and/or duration for patients at high risk of VTE. Pharmacists can help oncologists follow thromboprophylaxis guidelines by calculating VTE risk score and recommending a safe and effective dose of appropriate prophylactic anticoagulant.Educating and training oncologists about VTE risk assessment is recommended to enhance their practice in thromboprophlaxis.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsOncologistsQualitative ResearchVenous ThromboembolismAdultAnticoagulantsFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansIraqMaleMedical OncologyMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Risk AssessmentAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID39761243
PMCPMC11703059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.