ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025
Successful Surgical Management of Intracranial Carotid Artery Trauma Following Penetrating Facial Injury: A Case Report.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Operative management of a nail wound projectile to the skull base with unusual trajectory: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carotid artery injury has an incidence of 0.2% in the National Trauma Data Bank. The true incidence of intracranial carotid injury is unknown but can be estimated at less than one in 1000 trauma-related inpatient admissions in America. Operatively managed penetrating carotid trauma has a mortality rate approaching 20%, and the selection of the appropriate operative approach is not straightforward. We present a case of penetrating carotid trauma successfully managed via combined approach by neurosurgery and otolaryngology teams. CASE REPORT A 74-year-old woman fell into a honeysuckle bush. She presented with a branch embedded in the left cheek and blindness of the right eye. Further workup revealed the branch had penetrated the maxillary bone, pierced the right optic nerve, and lodged near the intracranial portion of the right internal carotid artery. She underwent emergent operative intervention via right pterional craniotomy with microsurgery and endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery with repair of the skull base. The foreign body was removed and the traumatic carotid laceration was repaired. The patient recovered successfully and was discharged on postoperative day 14. CONCLUSIONS The management of facially penetrating foreign bodies begins with assessment for neurologic deficits and vascular injury. We recommend leaving such objects in place and not removing them until definitive imaging is obtained. We present an interesting case of penetrating trauma to the intracranial carotid artery in which a retained foreign body was removed with satisfactory patient outcome using a combined endoscopic and open surgical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.