ArticleApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2025
An In Silico Approach to Uncover Selective JAK1 Inhibitors for Breast Cancer from Life Chemicals Database.
Article in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From virtual screening to cell-based assays: structure-guided identification of EGFR-targeting perimidine derivatives with anticancer activity.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Integrated experimental and computational evaluation of atractylenolide III from Tubipora musica for anticancer lead identification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Computational Discovery of NPA001937: A Novel Carotenoid Targeting Conserved Insect Proteins for Sustainable Pest Management.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2026Article
- An integrated study combining network toxicology machine learning and molecular simulation reveals the molecular mechanisms of permanent hair dyes in breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
JAK1, a key regulator of multiple oncogenic pathways, is a sought-out target, and its expression in immune cells and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is associated with a favorable prognosis in breast cancer. JAK1 activates IL-6 via ERBB2 receptor tyrosine kinase signalling and promotes metastatic cancer and STAT3 activation in breast cancer cells. Hence, targeting JAK1 in breast cancer is being explored as a potential therapeutic strategy. A comprehensive in silico approach was utilised in this study to identify selective JAK1 inhibitors from the Life chemicals database. First, we utilised an anticancer focussed library and performed molecular docking to screen against JAK1 protein. The top 10 compounds from docking were taken for cross-docking, to assess the selectivity towards JAK1 target. Lipinski's RO5 was checked for eliminating the compounds that violate rules. Toxicity, biological activity and reactivity for the identified best compounds were predicted by Protox-II server, PASS server and cDFT analysis respectively. MD simulations were carried out to examine the stability and dynamic behaviour of the top leads, including the long-term stability of the ligand-receptor complex and any conformational changes. Lastly, the MM/PBSA method was used to determine the binding free energy of the protein-ligand complex. Our in silico approach has yielded a promising set of compounds F2638-0133, F3408-0020 and F5833-7435 with the potential to selectively target JAK1, a critical player in breast cancer progression. The docking, simulation and MM/PBSA results were compared with standard drug abrocitinib. Identified compounds exhibit favorable binding interactions, electronic properties and robust stability profiles compared to standard drug, making them promising leads for further experimental validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39760987What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.