Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39760983›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2025

A Maximum-Use Trial of Ruxolitinib Cream in Children Aged 2-11 Years with Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis.

Linda Stein Gold, Robert Bissonnette, Seth Forman, Andrea Zaenglein, YuTzu Kuo, Brett Angel, Xuejun Chen, Howard Kallender, Amy S Paller

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05034822 (A Maximum Use), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05034822 phase1completednot on this map

A Maximum Use (MUsT) Pediatric Study of 1.5% Ruxolitinib Cream in Children (Ages ≥ 2 Years to < 12 Years) With Atopic Dermatitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorIncyte CorporationRan2021 to 2023Enrolled29ConditionsAtopic DermatitisArmsRuxolitinib cream
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Linda Stein GoldHenry Ford Health System, 1 Ford Pl, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA. LSTEIN1@hfhs.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2758-1605
Robert BissonnetteInnovaderm Research, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5927-6587
Seth FormanForCare Clinical Research, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5800-1856
Andrea ZaengleinPenn State/Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2507-7130
YuTzu KuoIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7215-9346
Brett AngelIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6416-0773
Xuejun ChenIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Howard KallenderIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5634-883X
Amy S PallerNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6187-6549

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRuxolitinib cream has demonstrated anti-inflammatory and antipruritic activity and was well tolerated in a phase 3 study in patients aged 2-11 years with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis (AD).

objectiveThis study examined the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and quality of life (QoL) with ruxolitinib cream under maximum-use conditions and with longer-term use.

methodsEligible patients were aged 2-11 years with moderate to severe AD [Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score 3-4], and ≥ 35% affected body surface area (BSA). Patients applied 1.5% ruxolitinib cream twice daily to all baseline-identified lesions during the 4-week maximum-use period, then to active lesions only up to week 52 (patients with ≤ 20% affected BSA from week 8). Safety was assessed by frequency and severity of adverse events. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed as secondary endpoints, and efficacy and QoL were exploratory endpoints.

resultsOverall, 29 patients (median age 5 years) were enrolled. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 9/29 patients (31.0%); there were no adverse events of special interest (i.e., no serious infections, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, or thromboses) during the study period. Mean steady-state plasma concentration during the maximum-use period was below the known half-maximal inhibitory concentration of Janus kinase-mediated myelosuppression in adults. Reductions in affected BSA and IGA observed at week 4 were sustained with as-needed use through 52 weeks. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes and QoL measures were consistent with efficacy results.

conclusionThese results support the safety of ruxolitinib cream in children (2-11 years) with AD, including those with extensive disease, and are consistent with previous efficacy findings. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT05034822, first registered 30 August 2021.

Indexed as

Dermatitis, AtopicPyrazolesAdministration, CutaneousChildChild, PreschoolClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansJanus Kinase InhibitorsMaleNitrilesPyrimidinesQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexSkin CreamJanus Kinase InhibitorsNitrilesPyrazolesPyrimidinesruxolitinib

Identifiers

PMID39760983
PMCPMC11850462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.