ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
Breast cancer classification based on breast tissue structures using the Jigsaw puzzle task in self-supervised learning.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A multi-scale adaptive filtering and AtRes_SRU-transformer synergy for breast cancer histopathology classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Self-supervised learning (SSL) has gained attention in the medical field as a deep learning approach utilizing unlabeled data. The Jigsaw puzzle task in SSL enables models to learn both features of images and the positional relationships within images. In breast cancer diagnosis, radiologists evaluate not only lesion-specific features but also the surrounding breast structures. However, deep learning models that adopt a diagnostic approach similar to human radiologists are still limited. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Jigsaw puzzle task in characterizing breast tissue structures for breast cancer classification on mammographic images. Using the Chinese Mammography Database (CMMD), we compared four pre-training pipelines: (1) IN-Jig, pre-trained with both the ImageNet classification task and the Jigsaw puzzle task, (2) Scratch-Jig, pre-trained only with the Jigsaw puzzle task, (3) IN, pre-trained only with the ImageNet classification task, and (4) Scratch, that is trained from random initialization without any pre-training tasks. All pipelines were fine-tuned using binary classification to distinguish between the presence or absence of breast cancer. Performance was evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Additionally, detailed analysis was conducted for performance across different radiological findings, breast density, and regions of interest were visualized using gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM). The AUC for the four models were 0.925, 0.921, 0.918, 0.909, respectively. Our results suggest the Jigsaw puzzle task is an effective pre-training method for breast cancer classification, with the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy with limited data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.