Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39760975›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025

Breast cancer classification based on breast tissue structures using the Jigsaw puzzle task in self-supervised learning.

Keisuke Sugawara, Eichi Takaya, Ryusei Inamori, Yuma Konaka, Jumpei Sato, Yuta Shiratori, Fumihito Hario, Tomoya Kobayashi, Takuya Ueda, Yoshikazu Okamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Keisuke SugawaraDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Eichi TakayaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan. eichi.takaya.d5@tohoku.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2541-1685
Ryusei InamoriDepartment of Radiological Imaging and Informatics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Yuma KonakaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Jumpei SatoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Yuta ShiratoriDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Fumihito HarioDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Tomoya KobayashiDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Takuya UedaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Yoshikazu OkamotoDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.

Funding

Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology JPMJCR15D1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-supervised learning (SSL) has gained attention in the medical field as a deep learning approach utilizing unlabeled data. The Jigsaw puzzle task in SSL enables models to learn both features of images and the positional relationships within images. In breast cancer diagnosis, radiologists evaluate not only lesion-specific features but also the surrounding breast structures. However, deep learning models that adopt a diagnostic approach similar to human radiologists are still limited. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Jigsaw puzzle task in characterizing breast tissue structures for breast cancer classification on mammographic images. Using the Chinese Mammography Database (CMMD), we compared four pre-training pipelines: (1) IN-Jig, pre-trained with both the ImageNet classification task and the Jigsaw puzzle task, (2) Scratch-Jig, pre-trained only with the Jigsaw puzzle task, (3) IN, pre-trained only with the ImageNet classification task, and (4) Scratch, that is trained from random initialization without any pre-training tasks. All pipelines were fine-tuned using binary classification to distinguish between the presence or absence of breast cancer. Performance was evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Additionally, detailed analysis was conducted for performance across different radiological findings, breast density, and regions of interest were visualized using gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM). The AUC for the four models were 0.925, 0.921, 0.918, 0.909, respectively. Our results suggest the Jigsaw puzzle task is an effective pre-training method for breast cancer classification, with the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy with limited data.

Indexed as

BreastBreast NeoplasmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSupervised Machine LearningDeep LearningFemaleHumansMammographyBreast cancerBreast tissueDeep learningJigsaw puzzleMammographySelf-supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID39760975
PMCPMC11876229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.