ArticleInternational orthopaedics2025
An accelerated deep learning model can accurately identify clinically important humeral and scapular landmarks on plain radiographs obtained before and after anatomic arthroplasty.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for postoperative plain radiographic assessment after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: current evidence, clinical readiness, and limitations.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAccurate identification of radiographic landmarks is fundamental to characterizing glenohumeral relationships before and sequentially after shoulder arthroplasty, but manual annotation of these radiographs is laborious. We report on the use of artificial intelligence, specifically computer vision and deep learning models (DLMs), in determining the accuracy of DLM-identified and surgeon identified (SI) landmarks before and after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. MATERIALS &
methods240 true anteroposterior radiographs were annotated using 11 standard osseous landmarks to train a deep learning model. Radiographs were modified to allow for a training model consisting of 2,260 images. The accuracy of DLM landmarks was compared to manually annotated radiographs using 60 radiographs not used in the training model. In addition, we also performed 14 different measurements of component positioning and compared these to measurements made based on DLM landmarks.
resultsThe mean deviation between DLM vs. SI cortical landmarks was 1.9 ± 1.9 mm. Scapular landmarks had slightly lower deviations compared to humeral landmarks (1.5 ± 1.8 mm vs. 2.1 ± 2.0 mm, p < 0.001). The DLM was also found to be accurate with respect to 14 measures of scapular, humeral, and glenohumeral measurements with a mean deviation of 2.9 ± 2.7 mm.
conclusionsAn accelerated deep learning model using a base of only 240 annotated images was able to achieve low levels of deviation in identifying common humeral and scapular landmarks on preoperative and postoperative radiographs. The reliability and efficiency of this deep learning model represents a powerful tool to analyze preoperative and postoperative radiographs while avoiding human observer bias. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39760903What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.