Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39760885›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2025

How to talk to parents.

Antoine Martin-Champetier, Alexia Dabadie

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Antoine Martin-ChampetierPaediatric and prenatal radiology department, Hôpital Timone Enfants, APHM, 264 rue Saint Pierre, Marseille, 13005, France. antoine.martin-champetier@ap-hm.fr.
Alexia DabadiePaediatric and prenatal radiology department, Hôpital Timone Enfants, APHM, 264 rue Saint Pierre, Marseille, 13005, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective communication with the child and his/her parents is of paramount importance in our daily work in paediatric radiology to establish a trusting relationship and enhance satisfaction for both patients and physicians. Although communication skills and empathy can be effectively taught, and efforts have been made in this area in medical schools, there is still much room for improvement, as communication skills tend to decline throughout medical training. Certain methods are valuable for conducting effective consultations with both the child and the parents, not only when breaking bad news. Paying attention to non-verbal cues can improve our understanding of the family's thoughts and enhance our ability to communicate through all channels. Rethinking the general environment of the department and consultation/ultrasound rooms may also promote effective communication. Having basic knowledge of intercultural communication and strategies for communicating with families with low literacy skills can also be beneficial. In paediatric interventional radiology, specific techniques can be used to better explain the procedure and the concept of risk and to address the family's anxiety.

Indexed as

CommunicationParentsPediatricsProfessional-Family RelationsChildHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsCommunicationNon-verbal communicationPaediatric radiologyParentsTriadic communication

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.