ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025
Use of a virtual phantom to assess the capability of a treatment planning system to perform magnetic resonance image distortion correction.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing anisotropic margins in single-isocenter multiple brain metastases radiosurgery using regressor strategies: A multi-institutional validation study.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment Planning Systems (TPS) offer algorithms for distortion correction (DC) of Magnetic Resonance (MR) images, whose performances demand proper evaluation. This work develops a procedure using a virtual phantom to quantitatively assess a TPS DC algorithm. Variations of the digital Brainweb MR study were created by introducing known distortions and Control Points (CPs). A synthetic Computed Tomography (sCT) study was created based upon the MR study. Elements TPS (Brainlab, Munich, Germany) was used to apply DC to the MR images, choosing the sCT as the gold standard. Deviations in the CP locations between the original images, the distorted images and the corrected images were calculated. Structural Similarity Metric (SSIM) tests were applied for further assessment of image corrections. The introduced distortion deviated the CP locations by a median (range) value of 1.8 (0.2-4.4) mm. After DC was applied, these values were reduced to 0.6 (0.1-1.9) mm. Correction of the original image deviated the CP locations by 0.2 (0-1.1) mm. The SSIM comparisons between the original and the distorted images yielded values of 0.23 and 0.67 before and after DC, respectively. The SSIM comparison of the original study, before and after DC, yielded a value of 0.97. The proposed methodology using a virtual phantom with CPs can be used to assess a TPS DC algorithm. Elements TPS effectively reduced MR distorsions below radiosurgery tolerances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39760846What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.