ArticleActa diabetologica2025
Impact of continuous glucose monitoring on pregnancy outcomes in women with pregestational diabetes.
Article in Acta diabetologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThis study aims to evaluate the impact of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on pregnancy outcomes in women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM).
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on 387 pregnant women with PGDM at Virgen del Rocío University Hospital in Seville, spanning from 2016 to 2022. The patients were categorized into two groups: 212 women who used continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and 175 women who self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). The study evaluated maternal characteristics, pregnancy complications, delivery methods, neonatal outcomes, and congenital anomalies.
resultsThe CGM group exhibited lower weight gain during pregnancy (9.6 kg vs. 10.0 kg, p = 0.02) and required fewer prenatal visits (7 vs. 8, p = 0.01). The rate of cesarean sections was significantly lower in the CGM group (53.1% vs. 58.2%, p = 0.03), and the incidence of macrosomia was reduced (12.9% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in congenital anomalies, intrauterine fetal deaths, or neonatal deaths between the groups.
conclusionsCGM in pregnant women with PGDM is associated with better pregnancy outcomes, including reduced cesarean section rates and lower incidence of macrosomia. These findings support the wider implementation of CGM for improved maternal and fetal health in PGDM pregnancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39760786What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.