ReviewBrain structure & function2025
Is there something sexual in the ventral midline thalamus?
Review in Brain structure & function, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The thalamic nucleus reuniens orchestrates prefrontal-hippocampal synchrony in memory, emotion, and disease.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026Review
- Age- and sex-dependent effects of stressors on activity of the nucleus reuniens of the thalamus.Schizophrenia research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This mini-review explores sexual dimorphism in the ventral midline thalamus, focusing on the reuniens nucleus and its role in behavioral functions. Traditionally linked to tasks such as working memory, cognitive flexibility, fear generalization, and memory consolidation, most studies have been conducted in male rodents. Research comparing the effects of ventral midline thalamus manipulations between female and male rodents is limited. Emerging evidence suggests sex-specific differences, particularly in response to stress, pharmacological manipulations, and memory processes. Studies reveal distinct c-Fos expression patterns in the reuniens nucleus between females and males, especially under stress, with females often showing different neural activation. Additionally, females exhibit different recruitment of the reuniens nucleus in object recognition tasks, indicating possible sex-dependent cognitive strategies. While evidence suggests functional differences between sexes in the reuniens nucleus, current data are limited. Further research is needed to understand how sex influences brain function and cognition, particularly in the ventral midline thalamus, which is crucial for various cognitive processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39760747What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.