ArticleInternational wound journal2024
A relationship analysis of the effects of COVID-19 isolation on pressure sores in a tertiary hospital.
Article in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mortality trends of pressure ulcers and non-healing wounds in the United States, 1999-2024.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Trends, Drivers and Projections of Pressure Injury Burden in China: Implications for National Healthcare Policy and Aging Governance.International wound journal · 2026Article
- Incidence and Risk Factors for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers in Patients With COVID-19.Cureus · 2025Article
- A relationship analysis of the effects of COVID-19 isolation on pressure sores in a tertiary hospital.International wound journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Management of pressure sores can have various environmental effects; moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic notably affected efforts towards effective management of pressure sores. Some cases of COVID-19 infections require long-term hospitalization in the intensive care unit. Moreover, special protective equipment worn by physicians owing to the pandemic complicate wound management. In this study, we compared the pressure ulcer characteristics between isolated patients with and those without COVID-19 and evaluated the effects of isolation on pressure sores. From November 2022 to February 2023, patients who had pressure sores were included and their medical records were reviewed retrospectively. The experimental group included patients with confirmed COVID-19 infections, who received clinical treatment in an isolated unit. Wound characteristics in each group and associated risk factors were analysed. Fifty-four isolated patients with COVID-19 and 58 control patients were included. The Braden Scale score and Korea patient classification system-1 did not vary significantly between the two groups. However, the number of Grade I pressure sores in the COVID-19 isolation group was significantly lower than those in the control group (p < 0.001), while the number of lesions was significantly higher (p = 0.034). The mortality rate in the COVID-19 isolation group was higher than that in the control group (p = 0.008), and more patients were discharged with unhealed wounds (p = 0.004). A higher treatment effect on pressure sores may be expected if the disease is more actively managed. Moreover, the wound care systems for isolated patients with COVID-19 require further attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.