Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39760532›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2025

Use of Robust Norming to Create a Sensitive Cognitive Summary Score in De Novo Parkinson's Disease: An Illustrative Example.

Daniel Weintraub, Michael C Brumm, Ryan Kurth, Michele K York, Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Parkinson's Disease Cognitive Composite: Lessons Forgotten from Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composites.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel WeintraubDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0633-7168
Michael C BrummDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3173-9989
Ryan KurthDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4569-5763
Michele K YorkDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4056-0742
Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative

Funding

Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research MJFF-022598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive impairment is common at all stages of Parkinson's disease (PD), but there is no consensus on which neuropsychological tests to use or how to interpret cognitive battery results. A cognitive summary score (CSS) combines the richness of a neuropsychological battery with the simplicity of a single score.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to determine whether a CSS created using robust norming can detect early cognitive deficits in de novo, untreated PD.

methodsBaseline cognitive data from PD participants and healthy control participants (HCs) in the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative were used to (1) create a robust HC subgroup without cognitive decline, (2) generate regression-based z scores for six cognitive measures using this subgroup, and (3) create a CSS by averaging all z scores.

resultsPD participants scored worse than HCs on all cognitive tests, with larger effects when compared with the robust HC subgroup rather than all HCs. Applying internally derived norms, the largest effects were for processing speed/working memory (Cohen's d = -0.55) and verbal episodic memory (Cohen's d = -0.48 and -0.52). Robust norming shifted PD performance from average (CSS z score = -0.01) to low average (CSS z score = -0.40), with a larger effect for the CSS (PD vs. robust HC subgroup; Cohen's d = -0.60) compared with individual tests.

conclusionsPatients with PD perform worse cognitively than HCs, particularly in processing speed and verbal memory. Robust norming increases effect sizes and decreases PD scores to expected levels. The CSS outperformed individual tests and may detect cognitive changes in early PD, making it a useful outcome measure in clinical research. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionNeuropsychological TestsParkinson DiseaseAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedcognitive impairmentcognitive testingneuropsychologyParkinson's disease

Identifiers

PMID39760532
PMCPMC11926498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.