Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39760507›Full record

ReviewChemical communications (Cambridge, England)2025

Single-wall carbon nanotube separations

Christopher M Sims, Ming Zheng, Jeffrey A Fagan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical communications (Cambridge, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Near-Infrared Fluorescent Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Biosensing.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher M SimsMaterials Science and Engineering Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 21045, USA. christopher.sims@nist.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5623-6974
Ming ZhengMaterials Science and Engineering Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 21045, USA. christopher.sims@nist.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8058-1348
Jeffrey A FaganMaterials Science and Engineering Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 21045, USA. christopher.sims@nist.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1483-5554

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aqueous two-phase extraction (ATPE) is an effective and scalable liquid-phase processing method for purifying single species of single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) from multiple species mixtures. Recent metrological developments have led to advances in the speed of identifying solution parameters leading to more efficient ATPE separations with greater fidelities. In this feature article, we review these developments and discuss their vast potential to further advance SWCNT separations science towards the optimization of production scale processes and the full realization of SWCNT-enabled technologies.

Identifiers

PMID39760507
PMCPMC11849132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.