ArticlePathology international2025
Histopathological study of the localization/distribution of Fusobacterium nucleatum in esophageal cancer.
Article in Pathology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Histopathological study of the localization/distribution of Fusobacterium nucleatum in esophageal cancer.Pathology international · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fusobacterium nucleatum is implicated in esophageal cancer; however, its distribution in esophageal cancer tissues remains unknown. This study aimed to clarify the presence and distribution of F. nucleatum in esophageal cancer tissues using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Tissues collected from 70 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were examined using FISH. Corresponding normal epithelium and metastatic lymph nodes were assessed. F. nucleatum was identified more frequently in esophageal cancer tissues than in the normal epithelium. F. nucleatum also showed significant correlation with factors associated with tumor progression, such as pT factor and tumor size. As tumor progression advanced, the area occupied by F. nucleatum gradually became larger. F. nucleatum positivity was observed around the deep edge of the tumor nest (border-dense type) or identified diffusely in the tumor nest (diffuse distributed type). Furthermore, F. nucleatum was observed in metastatic lymph nodes, lesions of venous invasion, and walls of veins in normal epithelium. In conclusion, we visualized F. nucleatum using FISH and identified different distribution patterns of F. nucleatum, highlighting the spot density of its presence in tumor tissues. Recognizing this quantitative change is pivotal for establishing F. nucleatum as a reliable biomarker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.