ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2025
Real-world antithrombotic strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation and recently developed acute coronary syndrome.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Antithrombotic Management of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Article
- The impact of chronic kidney disease on the antithrombotic strategies and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes and atrial fibrillation: Insights from STAR-ACS study.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The antithrombotic strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease following percutaneous coronary intervention is shifting towards less intensive. Nevertheless, for patients with AF and acute coronary syndrome (ACS), an optimal antithrombotic strategy is yet to be established. Methods and results: We conducted a multi-center cohort study involving 146 Japanese centers that had prospectively registered 460 patients with AF and ACS followed for 2 years. Primary endpoint was the composite of thrombotic and bleeding events, and secondary endpoints included heart failure hospitalization. At the time of study registration, 86 % of participants had received direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and 75 % had received aspirin-based triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) between March 2017 and August 2019. Apixaban was the most frequently used DOAC (29 %). While the proportion of anticoagulants did not change according to the time course, the intensity of antiplatelets significantly attenuated over time (dual antiplatelet at baseline: 75 %, and at 2-years: 7 %). The cumulative incidence of the primary outcome measure was similar in patients with warfarin and DOACs. However, the risk of heart failure hospitalization was significantly higher in those with warfarin compared to DOACs (Hazard ratio: 2.8, 95 % confidence interval: 1.1-5.8, p = 0.022). Conclusions: The present findings suggest the appropriate optimization of antithrombotic medication balancing in patients with AF and ACS in Japan by reducing the intensity of antiplatelets during the study period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.