Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39760116›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology

Comparison of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate Versus Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Indian Cirrhotic Patients: Report of a Pilot Study.

Smita Divyaveer, Madhuri Kashyap, Kushal Kekan, Ashok K Yadav, Jaskiran Kaur, Madhumita Premkumar, Akash Gandotra, Kanchan Prajapati, Arka De, Ajay K Duseja and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Smita DivyaveerDepartment of Nephrology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Madhuri KashyapDepartment of Nephrology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Kushal KekanDepartment of Nephrology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ashok K YadavDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Jaskiran KaurDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Madhumita PremkumarDepartment of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Akash GandotraDepartment of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Kanchan PrajapatiDepartment of Nephrology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Arka DeDepartment of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ajay K DusejaDepartment of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Nipun VermaDepartment of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Radhika AggarwalDepartment of Community Medicine, School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Vaishnavi VenkatasubramanianDepartment of Nephrology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Vaibhav TiwariDepartment of Nephrology, Sir Gangaram Hospital, Delhi, India.
Vishnuvardhan BagurDepartment of Nephrology, Manipal Hospital Whitefield, Bangalore, India.
Amol N PatilDepartment of Pharmacology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Nusrat SafiqDepartment of Pharmacology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Harbir S KohliDepartment of Nephrology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Renal impairment significantly affects morbidity and mortality rates of cirrhosis patients. Studies on glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) estimation did not include cirrhosis patients. These equations are erroneous and unreliable in cirrhosis due to sarcopenia. Further, the accuracy of eGFR equations varies across different ethnic groups. Measurement of GFR by iohexol clearance is a gold standard method of accurate determination of GFR. There is scarce data on iohexol GFR in cirrhosis and none in Indian population. Methodology: This was prospective observational study. Consecutive adult patients with cirrhosis with stable renal function for prior 1 month were included. Iohexol weight-based dosage was given and timed blood samples were taken to measure iohexol clearance. Plasma iohexol levels was measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and Cystatin-C was measured by ELISA in plasma samples. Results: Thirty-five patients were enrolled in the study. Hepatitis B (n = 5), hepatitis C (n = 4); alcoholic liver disease (n = 20), metabolic dysfunctional associated steatotic liver disease (n = 2), others/overlap (n = 3). The average eGFR by MDRD4, MDRD6, CKD-EPI Creat, CKD EPI Cys C, CKD EPI Creat-Cys C, RFHand GRAIL formulae were 105.24(24.2),104.75(23.5),102.14(15.9),68.91(16.5),82.91(15.21), 67.27 (14.08) and 112.9 (19.5) ml/min ml/min/1.73m Conclusion: The eGFR equations using creatinine are imprecise and less accurate in Indian patients with cirrhosis. All equations overestimate GFR. Equations especially developed for cirrhosis patients like MDRD6 are also not precise. Cystatin C based equations are better than creatinine-based equations. Further studies with large sample size are needed to establish an accurate method of GFR assessment in Indian patients with cirrhosis.

Indexed as

cirrhosiscystatin- CeGFRiohexol clearanceMELDmGFR

Identifiers

PMID39760116
PMCPMC11697551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.