ArticleHealth services insights2025
Healthcare Professionals' Ratings and Views of Person-Centred Care in the Context of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.
Article in Health services insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feasibility of a Person-Centred Nursing Model Targeting Patient and Family Caregiver Needs in Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) involves a long trajectory with high risk of complications. In person-centred care (PCC), patients' needs, resources and the care relationship are central to the care process. Healthcare professionals' (HCPs) ratings of PCC have not previously been investigated in this context. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate healthcare professionals' ratings and views of person-centred care in allo-HCT care, and associations with individual characteristics and targeted PCC education. Design: Cross-sectional study, employing quantitative and qualitative methods. Methods: 85 HCPs at two Swedish allo-HCT centres participated (80% women; mean age: 44 years, range: 23-72 years). A survey was conducted using the PCC Assessment Tool (P-CAT), containing 13 items, a total scale (min 13-max 65) and two subscales (I: min 8-max 40; II: min 5-max 25). Additionally, HCPs' written responses to four study-specific questions about PCC were collected. Results: The mean for P-CAT total scale was 45.31, (subscale I: 28.41; subscale II: 16.90). Higher ratings of PCC were reported for assessment of patients' needs, discussion about how to provide PCC and patients' care, while time to provide PCC, the care environment and how the organization prevents providing PCC were rated lower. Higher age and targeted PCC education were associated with higher PCC ratings. HCPs described PCC as the patient being seen as a capable individual with their own resources, with PCC increasing patient and family involvement-giving higher satisfaction and tailored care for patients. However, HCPs reported time as a barrier for PCC. Conclusion: HCPs' ratings of PCC in this context are high regarding discussing and assessing patients' needs, but there is room for improvement regarding organizational and environmental aspects. Targeted PCC education increases the level of PCC. HCPs' views of PCC partly reflect the foundations of PCC-patient's narrative, capability and involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.