Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39760068›Full record

ReviewBioactive materials2025

Advances in biomaterial-based tissue engineering for peripheral nerve injury repair.

Xinlei Yao, Tong Xue, Bingqian Chen, Xinyang Zhou, Yanan Ji, Zihui Gao, Boya Liu, Jiawen Yang, Yuntian Shen, Hualin Sun and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioactive materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Engineering Silk Fibroin-Based Biomaterials for Neural Repair.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Peptide-Incorporated Biomaterials Promote Regeneration of Peripheral Nerve Injuries.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xinlei YaoKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, 226001, PR China.
Tong XueDepartment of Paediatrics and Clinical Medicine, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, 226001, PR China.
Bingqian ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, First People's Hospital of Changshu City, Changshu, Jiangsu Province, 215500, PR China.
Xinyang ZhouKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, 226001, PR China.
Yanan JiKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, 226001, PR China.
Zihui GaoKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, 226001, PR China.
Boya LiuKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, 226001, PR China.
Jiawen YangDepartment of Paediatrics and Clinical Medicine, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, 226001, PR China.
Yuntian ShenKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, 226001, PR China.
Hualin SunKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, 226001, PR China.
Xiaosong GuKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, 226001, PR China.
Bin DaiDepartment of Orthopedics, Binhai County People's Hospital, Binhai, Jiangsu Province, 224500, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injury is a common clinical disease. Effective post-injury nerve repair remains a challenge in neurosurgery, and clinical outcomes are often unsatisfactory, resulting in social and economic burden. Particularly, the repair of long-distance nerve defects remains a challenge. The existing nerve transplantation strategies show limitations, including donor site morbidity and immune rejection issues. The multiple studies have revealed the potential of tissue engineering strategies based on biomaterials in the repair of peripheral nerve injuries. We review the events of regeneration after peripheral nerve injury, evaluates the efficacy of existing nerve grafting strategies, and delves into the progress in the construction and application strategies of different nerve guidance conduits. A spotlight is cast on the materials, technologies, seed cells, and microenvironment within these conduits to facilitate optimal nerve regeneration. Further discussion was conducted on the approve of nerve guidance conduits and potential future research directions. This study anticipates and proposes potential avenues for future research, aiming to refine existing strategies and uncover innovative approaches in biomaterial-based nerve repair. This study endeavors to synthesize the collective insights from the fields of neuroscience, materials science, and regenerative medicine, offering a multifaceted perspective on the role of biomaterials in advancing the frontiers of peripheral nerve injury treatment.

Indexed as

BiomaterialsNerve guidance conduitsPeripheral nerve injuryPeripheral nerve regenerationTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID39760068
PMCPMC11699443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.