ReviewForensic science international. Synergy2024
Directions for improving the financial support of forensic expert forensic activity in Ukraine with account of positive foreign experience.
Review in Forensic science international. Synergy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transformation of public administration in the sphere of forensic science activity in Ukraine under martial law.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Article
- Methodological support for forensic science in the USA and Ukraine: A comparative study.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2025Article
- Digitalisation of forensic expert activity in Ukraine: Organisational and legal framework.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relevance of the issues studied in this article is due to the need to form an efficiently functioning system of regulating forensic expert activity in general and its individual components, in particular, financial support, taking into account positive foreign experience. The author proposes to introduce separate budget programmes for state specialised institutions of each state agency, which will help to resolve the issues of proper funding and justification of expenditures, and will serve as an anti-corruption factor. Attention is focused on the need to develop a unified methodological approach to calculating the number of forensic examinations. The author emphasises the importance of summarizing the financial statements of state specialised institutions engaged in forensic activities and making them available to the public. It is stated that there is an urgent necessity to find reasonable opportunities to expand the financial autonomy of state specialised institutions. The author proves the need to include forensic experts in the list of persons obliged to file declarations and introduce financial monitoring of forensic experts' lifestyle. The author concludes that it is expedient to introduce a mixed system for determining the cost of forensic examinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.