Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39760044›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2024

Learning Clinical Reasoning in Forensic Medicine: A Scoping Review.

Hind Abouzahir, Ahmed Belhouss, Hicham Benyaich

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hind AbouzahirMedicolegal Institute, Ibn Rochd University Hospital,, Casablanca, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0001-5590-2472
Ahmed BelhoussMedicolegal Institute, Ibn Rochd University Hospital,, Casablanca, Morocco.
Hicham BenyaichMedicolegal Institute, Ibn Rochd University Hospital,, Casablanca, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This scoping review aimed to explore the existing literature on teaching clinical reasoning in the field of forensic medicine. Methods: The scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. Results: The initial search yielded a total of 98 articles, of which 40 studies met the inclusion criteria. Case-based learning enhances critical thinking, particularly in forensic domains like chemistry and medicine. Simulation-based learning, using tools such as virtual reality, improves practical skills, crucial in crime scene investigation. Problem-based learning fosters critical thinking and teamwork, proving successful in crime scene investigation and forensic speech science. Addressing persistent challenges like cognitive biases, the study recommends incorporating debiasing strategies and clinical reasoning theories into forensic science training programs. Conclusion: The heterogeneity of assessment methods and educational outcomes limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions regarding the effectiveness of specific teaching strategies. Integrating a combination of the three methods can create a comprehensive and effective curriculum, catering to diverse learning preferences in forensic science education.

Indexed as

Case learningClinical reasoningEducationForensic medicineProblem learningSimulation

Identifiers

PMID39760044
PMCPMC11699007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.