ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
The clinical efficacy of a novel smartphone-based salivary self-test for the prediction of pre-eclampsia, pregnancy-induced hypertension and intrauterine growth restriction: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Salivary uric acid remote serial self-testing for prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes of uteroplacental dysfunction.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study investigated the efficacy of a digital health solution utilizing smartphone images of colorimetric test-strips for home-based salivary uric acid (sUA) measurement to predict pre-eclampsia (PE), pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Methods: 495 pregnant women were included prospectively at Zealand University Hospital, Denmark. They performed weekly self-tests from mid-pregnancy until delivery and referred these for analysis by a smartphone-app. Baseline characteristics were obtained at recruitment and pregnancy outcomes from the journals. The mean compliance rate of self-testing was assessed. For the statistical analyses, standard color analyses deduced the images into the red-green-blue (RGB) color model value, to observe the individual, longitudinal pattern throughout the pregnancy for each outcome. Extended color analyses were applied, deducing the images into 72 individual color variables that reflected the four dominant color models. The individual discriminatory ability was assessed by calculating the area under the curve for the outcome of PE, and the outcome of hypertensive pregnancy disorders solely or combined with IUGR at 25 weeks of gestation and for the weekly color change between 20 and 25 weeks of gestation. Results: Thirty-four women (6.9%) developed PE, 17 (3.4%) PIH, and 10 (2.0%) IUGR. The overall mean compliance rate was 67%, increasing to 77% after updating the smartphone-app halfway through the study. The longitudinal pattern of the RGB value showed a wide within-person variability, and discrimination was not achieved. However, it was noted that all women with IUGR repeatedly had RGB values below 110, contrasting women with non-IUGR. Significant discriminatory ability was achieved for 8.2% of the analyses of individual color variables, of which 27.4% summarized the Hue color variable. However, the analyses lacked consistency regarding outcome group and gestational age. Conclusion: This study is the first proof-of-concept that digital self-tests utilizing colorimetric sUA measurement for the prediction of PE, PIH, and IUGR is acceptable to pregnant women. The discriminatory ability was not found be sufficient to have clinical value. However, being the first study that compares individual color variables of the four dominant color models, this study adds important methodological insights into the expanding field of smartphone-assisted colorimetric test-strips.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.