Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39759976›Full record

ArticleEcosystems (New York, N.Y.)2025

Linking Fire, Food Webs, and Fish in Stream Ecosystems.

David A Roon, J Ryan Bellmore, Joseph R Benjamin, François-Nicolas Robinne, Rebecca L Flitcroft, Jana E Compton, Joseph L Ebersole, Jason B Dunham, Kevin D Bladon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecosystems (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David A RoonOregon State University, Department of Forest Ecosystems & Society, Corvallis, Oregon USA.
J Ryan BellmoreUSDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Juneau, Alaska USA.
Joseph R BenjaminUS Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Boise, Idaho USA.
François-Nicolas RobinnePacific Salmon Foundation, Salmon Watersheds Program, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada.
Rebecca L FlitcroftUSDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, Oregon USA.
Jana E ComptonUS EPA, Office of Research and Development, Corvallis, Oregon USA.
Joseph L EbersoleUS EPA, Office of Research and Development, Corvallis, Oregon USA.
Jason B DunhamUS Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Corvallis, Oregon USA.
Kevin D BladonOregon State University, Department of Forest Ecosystems & Society, Corvallis, Oregon USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As wildfire regimes shift, resource managers are concerned about potential threats to aquatic ecosystems and the species they support, especially fishes. However, predicting fish responses can be challenging because wildfires affect aquatic ecosystems via multiple pathways. Application of whole-ecosystem approaches, such as food web modeling, can act as heuristic tools that offer valuable insights that account for these different mechanisms. We applied a dynamic food web simulation model that mechanistically linked stream trophic dynamics to the myriad effects that wildfires can have on aquatic and riparian ecosystems at a local stream reach-scale. We simulated how wildfires of different severity may influence short- (months to years) and long-term (years to decades) periphyton, aquatic invertebrate, and fish biomass dynamics in forested headwater streams of the western Pacific Northwest (USA). In many cases, wildfire increased modeled periphyton, invertebrate, and fish biomass over both short- and long-time periods. However, modeled responses varied extensively in their direction (that is, positive or negative), magnitude, and duration depending on fire severity, time since fire, and trophic level. The shapes of these response trajectories were especially sensitive to predicted wildfire effects on water temperature, canopy cover, riparian shading, and instream turbidity. Model simulations suggest a single fire could result in a wide range of aquatic ecosystem responses, especially in watersheds with mixed burn severity. Our analysis highlights the utility of whole-ecosystem approaches, like food web modeling, as heuristic tools for improving our understanding of the mechanisms linking fire, food webs, and fish and for identifying contexts where fires could have deleterious impacts on fishes. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10021-024-00955-4.

Indexed as

Aquatic-terrestrial linkagesDisturbanceEcosystem modelingFishFood websWildfire

Identifiers

PMID39759976
PMCPMC11698785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.