Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39759973›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2024

Recent trends and impact of localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) in modern analysis.

Bibhu Prasad Nanda, Priyanka Rani, Priyanka Paul, Aman, Subrahmanya S Ganti, Rohit Bhatia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Innovative synthesis of SbRSC advances · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bibhu Prasad NandaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, ISF College of Pharmacy Moga, 142001, Punjab, India.
Priyanka RaniDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, ISF College of Pharmacy Moga, 142001, Punjab, India.
Priyanka PaulDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, ISF College of Pharmacy Moga, 142001, Punjab, India.
AmanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, ISF College of Pharmacy Moga, 142001, Punjab, India.
Subrahmanya S GantiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, ISF College of Pharmacy Moga, 142001, Punjab, India.
Rohit BhatiaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, ISF College of Pharmacy Moga, 142001, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An optical biosensor is a specialized analytical device that utilizes the principles of optics and light in bimolecular processes. Localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) is a phenomenon in the realm of nanophotonics that occurs when metallic nanoparticles (NPs) or nanostructures interact with incident light. Conversely, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) is an influential analytical technique based on Raman scattering, wherein it amplifies the Raman signals of molecules when they are situated near specific and specially designed nanostructures. A detailed exploration of the recent ground-breaking developments in optical biosensors employing LSPR and SERS technologies has been thoroughly discussed along with their underlying principles and the working mechanisms. A biosensor chip has been created, featuring a high-density deposition of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) under varying ligand concentration and reaction duration on the substrate. An ordinary description, along with a visual illustration, has been thoroughly provided for concepts such as a sensogram, refractive index shift, surface plasmon resonance (SPR), and the evanescent field, Rayleigh scattering, Raman scattering, as well as the electromagnetic enhancement and chemical enhancement. LSPR and SERS both have advantages and disadvantages, but widely used SERS has some advantages over LSPR, like chemical specificity, high sensitivity, multiplexing, and versatility in different fields. This review confirms and elucidates the significance of different disease biomarker identification. LSPR and SERS both play a vital role in the detection of various types of cancer, such as cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, and brain tumors. This proposed optical biosensor offers potential applications for early diagnosis and monitoring of viral disease, bacterial infectious diseases, fungal diseases, diabetes, and cardiac disease biosensing. LSPR and SERS provide a new direction for environmental monitoring, food safety, refining impurities from water samples, and lead detection. The understanding of these biosensors is still limited and challenging.

Indexed as

BiomarkerBiosensorsCancerLocalized surface plasmon resonanceNanoparticlesNanophotonicSurface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID39759973
PMCPMC11696664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.