Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39759968›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2024

Green analytical chemistry metrics for evaluating the greenness of analytical procedures.

Lei Yin, Luyao Yu, Yingxia Guo, Chuya Wang, Yuncheng Ge, Xinyue Zheng, Ning Zhang, Jiansong You, Yong Zhang, Meiyun Shi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Early-stage drug discovery in a new-generation ultrahigh-throughput mass spectrometry platform.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lei YinCancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Shenyang, 110042, China.
Luyao YuSchool of Chemical Engineering, Ocean and Life Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, Liaoning, 124221, China.
Yingxia GuoSchool of Chemical Engineering, Ocean and Life Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, Liaoning, 124221, China.
Chuya WangSchool of Chemical Engineering, Ocean and Life Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, Liaoning, 124221, China.
Yuncheng GeSchool of Chemical Engineering, Ocean and Life Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, Liaoning, 124221, China.
Xinyue ZhengSchool of Chemical Engineering, Ocean and Life Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, Liaoning, 124221, China.
Ning ZhangSchool of Chemical Engineering, Ocean and Life Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, Liaoning, 124221, China.
Jiansong YouAim Honesty Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Dalian, Liaoning, 116600, China.
Yong ZhangCancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Shenyang, 110042, China.
Meiyun ShiCancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Shenyang, 110042, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Green analytical chemistry (GAC) focuses on mitigating the adverse effects of analytical activities on human safety, human health, and environment. In addition to the 12 principles of GAC, proper GAC tools should be developed and employed to assess the greenness of different analytical assays. The 15 widely used GAC metrics, i.e., national environmental methods index (NEMI), advanced NEMI, assessment of green profile (AGP), chloroform-oriented toxicity estimation scale (ChlorTox Scale), Analytical Eco-Scale, Green Certificate Modified Eco-Scale, analytical method greenness score (AMGS), green analytical procedure index (GAPI), ComplexGAPI, red-green-blue (RGB) additive color model, RGB 12 algorithm, analytical greenness calculator (AGREE), AGREE preparation (AGREEprep), HEXAGON, and blue applicability grade index (BAGI), are selected as the typical tools. This article comprehensively presents and elucidates the principles, characteristics, merits, and demerits of 15 widely used GAC tools. This review is helpful for researchers to use the current GAC metrics to assess the environmental sustainability of analytical assays.

Indexed as

Analytical methodsEnvironmental sustainabilityGreen analytical chemistryGreenness metric

Identifiers

PMID39759968
PMCPMC11697060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.