Articlenpj biological physics and mechanics2024
Hybrid model of tumor growth, angiogenesis and immune response yields strategies to improve antiangiogenic therapy.
Article in npj biological physics and mechanics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Oncology of Chemotaxis-Driven Tumour-Immune Spatial Patterning and Stability.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A multiphysics computational model of focused ultrasound-enhanced drug delivery using temperature-sensitive liposomes.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Article
- Alverine-Loaded Lipid Bilayer-Graphene Oxide Hybrids as a Novel Nanomedicine Platform for Neural Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Quantitative assessment of extravasation of IL-15-secreting MSLN-CAR-NK-92 cells using tumor transparency imaging.Theranostics · 2026Article
- Deficiency of GLUT1 in macrophages reprograms tumor-associated macrophages to normalize tumor vasculature and retards the progression of tumors.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Article
- Mechanistic mathematical modeling of abscopal effect reveals mechanisms of off-target tumor response.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- A Systematic Comparative Analysis of Tumor Size Models Based on Erlotinib Clinical Data in Advanced NSCLC.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Article
- Fluorescent Peptides Internalize HeLa Cells and Kill Multidrug-Resistant Clinical Bacterial Isolates.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- ARHGDIB as a prognostic biomarker and modulator of the immunosuppressive microenvironment in glioma.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025Article
- Personalized peripheral vascular interventional embolization for tumor: tailoring treatment to improve outcomes.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Targeting the tumor microenvironment in pediatric gliomas: Advances and future directions in immunotherapy.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solid tumors harbor a complex and dynamic microenvironment that hinders the delivery and efficacy of therapeutic interventions. In this study, we developed and utilized a hybrid, discrete-continuous mathematical model to explore the interplay between solid tumor growth, immune response, tumor-induced angiogenesis, and antiangiogenic drugs. By integrating published data with anti-angiogenic drugs, we elucidate three primary mechanisms by which anti-angiogenesis influences tumor progression and treatment outcomes: reduction in tumor growth rate by mitigating and temporally delaying angiogenesis, normalization of blood vessel structure and function, and improving immune cell extravasation and activation. Our results indicate a significant increase in functional blood vessels and perfusion following anti-angiogenic treatment, which in turn improves the intratumoral distribution of immune cells. The normalization window, or optimal time frame for anti-angiogenic drug administration, and the dose of the drug arise naturally in the model and are highlighted as crucial factors in maximizing treatment benefits. Prolonged anti-angiogenic treatment triggers cancer cell migration into healthy tissue and induces immunosuppression due to hypoxia, potentially leading to negative effects because these cancer cells will rapidly proliferate upon treatment termination. In conclusion, the positive contribution of anti-angiogenic treatment must balance the possible negative effects by choosing a proper treatment protocol as well as combining it with proper anti-cancer treatment. Our findings provide valuable insights and a framework for the design of protocols with anti-angiogenic treatment, targeted immunotherapy, and non-targeted anti-cancer therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.