Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39759899›Full record

ArticleTelemedicine reports2024

Pediatric Primary Care Telemedicine: Perspectives from English- and Spanish-Speaking Medicaid Enrollees.

Anne R Links, Eliana M Perrin, Sarah Polk, Divya Konduru, Shafkat Meraj, Nakiya N Showell, Suzanne M Grieb, Helen Hughes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Telemedicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anne R LinksDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0053-2878
Eliana M PerrinDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Sarah PolkDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Divya KonduruJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Shafkat MerajJohns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore Maryland, USA.
Nakiya N ShowellDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Suzanne M GriebDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Helen HughesDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9359-2380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To qualitatively explore Medicaid-enrolled parents' and young adult patients' perspectives and experiences with telemedicine in pediatric primary care. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with participants to explore their experiences with telemedicine. Participants consisted of English- and Spanish-speaking parents and young adults (18-21) who engaged in a telemedicine visit between March 15, 2021 and December 31, 2022 at two pediatric primary care clinics whose patients are predominantly insured by Medicaid. A qualitative descriptive design was used to develop a taxonomy. Frequencies were obtained to identify the most prevalent themes. Results: Twenty-six participants (22 parents, 4 young adults) were interviewed. Twelve (46%) participants were English-speaking and 14 (53%) were Spanish-speaking. Four domains were identified, each further classified into themes: pre-visit expectations (option for in-person visit, general anticipation, and specific worries), visit experience (general sentiment, technology, and quality of care), comfort (with overall process, privacy, and communication), and feelings about telemedicine (advantages, disadvantages, and loss of telemedicine). Although many participants had negative expectations of telemedicine prior to their appointment, a majority indicated positive experiences with visits and concerns about a possible future where telemedicine visits at home were no longer covered by their health insurance. Discussion: Most participants indicated positive experiences with telemedicine and perceived negative impact if access was removed. Findings related to perceived quality of care, advantages, and disadvantages suggest that patient preferences and individual circumstances should be taken into account when choosing visit modality in similar settings.

Indexed as

health care utilizationMedicaidpatient perspectivespediatricsqualitativetelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID39759899
PMCPMC11693964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.