Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39759834›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in global women's health2024

Magnitude and associated factors of postpartum family planning uptake among postpartum women in Ethiopia: an umbrella review.

Teketel Ermias Geltore, Simegn Alemu, Abiy Tadesse Angelo, Teketel Tesfaye Mamito, Workneh Elias Orsongo, Lakew Lafebo Foto, Tesfahun Simon Hadaro

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in global women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Teketel Ermias GeltoreDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wachemo University Durame Campus, Durame, Ethiopia.
Simegn AlemuDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wachemo University Durame Campus, Durame, Ethiopia.
Abiy Tadesse AngeloDepartment of Nursing, Mizan Tepi University, Mizan Aman, Ethiopia.
Teketel Tesfaye MamitoDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wachemo University Durame Campus, Durame, Ethiopia.
Workneh Elias OrsongoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolaita Sodo University, Sodo, Ethiopia.
Lakew Lafebo FotoSchool of Public Health, Institute of Health Science, Bule Hora University, Bule Hora, Ethiopia.
Tesfahun Simon HadaroDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Science, Ariba Minch University, Ariba Minch, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization indicates that despite advancements, the rates of maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity during the postpartum period continue to be alarmingly high. Furthermore, untapped opportunities to enhance maternal health and promote effective newborn care, including family planning services, have not been fully leveraged. Earlier meta-analyses and systematic reviews have addressed this subject; however, a thorough evidence synthesis has not been provided. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compile the existing systematic reviews (SRs) concerning postpartum family planning uptake among postpartum women in Ethiopia. Method: This review used an umbrella review method, incorporating numerous systematic reviews. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies guideline (MOOSE). A comprehensive literature review was conducted across prominent four electronic databases (including MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science and Science Direct) from June 15, to July 15, 2024. This review encompassed investigations carried out within the uptake of family planning among post-partum women and its determinants in Ethiopia were the primary outcome. A set of inclusion criteria was established to identify all pertinent systematic reviews, including studies, with no restrictions on data collection and publication year. The quality of the methods was evaluated using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews tool, (AMSTAR) tool. Statistical analysis was conducted using STATA version 17 software, and the 95% confidence interval was utilized to establish statistical significance. I-squared statistics were employed to evaluate the heterogeneity of the studies by using a random-effects meta-analysis model. Results: The umbrella review includes five studies with a total of 44,276 postpartum women. The pooled prevalence of postpartum family planning utilization was 36.41% (95% CI: 24.78, 48.03). Family planning counseling (AOR: 4.12, 95% CI: 2.89, 4.71), couple discussion (AOR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.42, 5.60), and postnatal follow-up (AOR: 3.48, 95% CI: 2.60, 4.83) were significantly associated with postpartum family planning uptake. Conclusion: The study results indicate that the adoption of postpartum family planning in Ethiopia requires focused intervention. This can be achieved by identifying and enhancing community frameworks to involve men in reproductive health initiatives and by providing comprehensive family planning information and services during postnatal care. Addressing the aforementioned factors is crucial to mitigate the risks associated with unintended pregnancies and to manage the swift increase in population. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024568435, PROSPERO (CRD42024568435).

Indexed as

Ethiopiafamily planningpostpartumSR and MAutilization

Identifiers

PMID39759834
PMCPMC11697147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.