Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39759781›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2024

Evaluation of the Effects of a Combination of Vitamin C, Thiamine and Hydrocortisone vs Hydrocortisone Alone on ICU Outcome in Patients with Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Sachit Sharma, Hem R Paneru, Gentle S Shrestha, Pramesh S Shrestha, Subhash P Acharya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Corticosteroids for treating sepsis in children and adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Appropriately Designed Studies are Needed before Thiamine and Vitamin C Plus Hydrocortisone are Judged Non-beneficial in Septic Shock.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sachit SharmaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Bagmati, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7783-2361
Hem R PaneruDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Bagmati, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3487-5388
Gentle S ShresthaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Bagmati, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0385-2340
Pramesh S ShresthaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Bagmati, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5890-0018
Subhash P AcharyaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Bagmati, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1596-0496

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims and background: Glucocorticoids, vitamin C and thiamine have important biological effects in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Multiple studies have demonstrated the beneficial role of a combination therapy of vitamin C, hydrocortisone and thiamine in patients with sepsis and septic shock in terms of mortality reduction, and increase in the number of days free of ventilators and vasopressors. Materials and methods: Patients who had septic shock were assessed for eligibility after intensive care unit (ICU) admission. After randomization, the treatment group received a combination of vitamin C, thiamine and hydrocortisone for a duration of 96 hours (16 doses) and the control group received hydrocortisone for a duration till the patient was on vasopressors. The primary outcome assessed was ICU mortality, and the key secondary outcome was the duration free of vasopressor administration at the end of 7 days. Results: A total of 86 patients were included in the study. Seventy percent of patients in the control group and 58 percent in the intervention group died during ICU stay. None of the primary and secondary outcomes were statistically significant. Conclusion: The use of a combination of vitamin C, hydrocortisone and thiamine has no added benefits over the use of hydrocortisone alone in patients with septic shock. Clinical significance: The results of this clinical trial shows that the use of a combination of vitamin C, hydrocortisone and thiamine in patients with septic shock is not useful and should not be a routine practice in critically ill septic patients. How to cite this article: Sharma S, Paneru HR, Shrestha GS, Shrestha PS, Acharya SP. Evaluation of the Effects of a Combination of Vitamin C, Thiamine and Hydrocortisone vs Hydrocortisone Alone on ICU Outcome in Patients with Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(12):1147-1152.

Indexed as

HydrocortisoneIntensive care unitSeptic shockThiamineVasopressorsVitamin C

Identifiers

PMID39759781
PMCPMC11695884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.