Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39759761›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2024

Classification of ROI-based fMRI data in short-term memory tasks using discriminant analysis and neural networks.

Magdalena Fafrowicz, Marcin Tutajewski, Igor Sieradzki, Jeremi K Ochab, Anna Ceglarek-Sroka, Koryna Lewandowska, Tadeusz Marek, Barbara Sikora-Wachowicz, Igor T Podolak, Paweł Oświęcimka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Magdalena FafrowiczDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroergonomics, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Marcin TutajewskiInstitute of Theoretical Physics, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Igor SieradzkiGroup of Machine Learning Methods GMUM, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Jeremi K OchabInstitute of Theoretical Physics, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Anna Ceglarek-SrokaDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroergonomics, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Koryna LewandowskaDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroergonomics, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Tadeusz MarekFaculty of Psychology, SWPS University, Katowice, Poland.
Barbara Sikora-WachowiczDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroergonomics, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Igor T PodolakGroup of Machine Learning Methods GMUM, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Paweł OświęcimkaInstitute of Theoretical Physics, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding brain function relies on identifying spatiotemporal patterns in brain activity. In recent years, machine learning methods have been widely used to detect connections between regions of interest (ROIs) involved in cognitive functions, as measured by the fMRI technique. However, it's essential to match the type of learning method to the problem type, and extracting the information about the most important ROI connections might be challenging. In this contribution, we used machine learning techniques to classify tasks in a working memory experiment and identify the brain areas involved in processing information. We employed classical discriminators and neural networks (convolutional and residual) to differentiate between brain responses to distinct types of visual stimuli (visuospatial and verbal) and different phases of the experiment (information encoding and retrieval). The best performance was achieved by the LGBM classifier with 1-time point input data during memory retrieval and a convolutional neural network during the encoding phase. Additionally, we developed an algorithm that took into account feature correlations to estimate the most important brain regions for the model's accuracy. Our findings suggest that from the perspective of considered models, brain signals related to the resting state have a similar degree of complexity to those related to the encoding phase, which does not improve the model's accuracy. However, during the retrieval phase, the signals were easily distinguished from the resting state, indicating their different structure. The study identified brain regions that are crucial for processing information in working memory, as well as the differences in the dynamics of encoding and retrieval processes. Furthermore, our findings indicate spatiotemporal distinctions related to these processes. The analysis confirmed the importance of the basal ganglia in processing information during the retrieval phase. The presented results reveal the benefits of applying machine learning algorithms to investigate working memory dynamics.

Indexed as

explainabilityfMRImachine learningneural networkROIworking memory

Identifiers

PMID39759761
PMCPMC11695337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.