ArticleCureus2024
Predictive Factors of Dental Implant Failure: A Retrospective Study Using Decision Tree Regression.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prospective clinical study to evaluate the survival of two-piece zirconia implants: a single-center study. 36-month results.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- An Assessment of Implant Stability and Bite Force Following Early and Delayed Dental Implant Placement.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Biofunctionalization of Collagen Barrier Membranes with Bone-Conditioned Medium, as a Natural Source of Growth Factors, Enhances Osteoblastic Cell Behavior.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDental implants are routinely used to replace missing teeth. Therefore, the primary aim of the present study was to assess the single-unit implant failure rate over a period of seven years from 2015 to 2021, with a minimum of two years post-implant follow-up. The secondary aim was to identify the risk factors associated with implant failure using machine learning decision tree regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn eight-year retrospective study was conducted using the clinical records of 224 patients who received single-unit dental implants between January 2014 and December 2021, where risk factors for early (EIF) and late implant failure (LIF) were identified. The patients' clinical case records and radiographs were used to assess implant failure.
resultsSmoking and peri-implantitis were principal contributors to failure (p=0.001). Implant failure was more common in males, the maxillary jaw, and posterior teeth, although these factors were not significantly associated with implant failure (p>0.05). The duration of failure was 16.87±4.6 months for LIF, in contrast to 5.71±1.38 months in EIF. Bruxism and peri-implantitis were correlated with diminished survival duration, especially when compounded by additional risk factors such as diabetes mellitus. Isolated peri-implantitis yielded an average failure duration of approximately 13.4 months, whereas bruxism intensified the failure interval to approximately 13.8 months. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that among the identified causes of failure, peri-implantitis and smoking were the predominant factors, followed by bruxism, diabetes, and complications related to osseointegration.
conclusionAge, sex, type of surgical procedure, sinus lift, and grafting procedures were not significantly associated with dental implant failure, whereas bruxism, peri-implantitis, lack of osseointegration, smoking, and type 2 diabetes mellitus were significant predictors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.