Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39759732›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Carotid Body Tumor: Incidental Discovery and Diagnosis.

Sidhartha G Senapati, Lakshmi Kattamuri, Abhizith Deoker

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sidhartha G SenapatiInternal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, USA.
Lakshmi KattamuriInternal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, USA.
Abhizith DeokerInternal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carotid body tumors (CBTs), rare neuroendocrine neoplasms near the carotid bifurcation, are mostly asymptomatic but may cause discomfort and autonomic dysfunction. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is used for diagnosis, eliminating the need for a biopsy to avoid the risk of hemorrhage. Surgical excision is the preferred treatment, while radiotherapy is an option when surgery is impractical. A 75-year-old woman with diabetes and hypertension presented to the emergency room (ER) with nausea, vomiting, and severe headache. Her blood pressure was 196/134 mmHg, her heart rate was 140 beats per minute (bpm), and her electrocardiogram (EKG) showed atrial fibrillation (AF). Physical examination revealed elevated jugular venous pressure. Preliminary lab investigations were normal. CT of the head, followed by an MRI of the neck with and without contrast, showed a stable 38 x 53 x 15 mm mass in the left side of the neck consistent with carotid body paraganglioma. A hormonal workup indicated elevated metanephrines, ruling out adrenal tumors. An abdominal CT scan showed no adrenal tumors. Due to her age and comorbidities, radiotherapy was planned for the stable mass. This article discusses the diagnosis of a rare, slow-growing carotid body tumor that requires thorough assessment, including patient history and radiologic evaluation.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationcarotid body tumorsneuroendocrine neoplasmsparagangliomapheochromocytoma

Identifiers

PMID39759732
PMCPMC11698547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.