ReviewCureus2024
A Comparison Between Intensive and Conventional Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Regarding the Pre-operative Outcomes After Total Knee Replacement.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Operative times of 7 common Orthopaedic Trauma procedures: is there a difference between trainees and consultants?Orthopedic reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Joint degeneration characterized by cartilage deterioration and bone wear is the hallmark of osteoarthritis (OA), a condition that worsens over time. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the most common effective treatment for OA. Conventional therapy training (CTT) is the standard intervention; we are testing whether intensive therapy training (ITT) provides different results when used preoperatively. Our study compared intensive and standard preoperative physical therapy in randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, excluding various other study types. Two independent researchers assessed the risk of bias using appropriate tools (RoB 2 for RCTs (Cochrane Methods, London, UK) and ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies (Cochrane Methods, London, UK)). The analysis, conducted using ReviewManager 5.4 (Cochrane Methods, London, UK), presented results as mean differences (MD) with 95% CIs, employing fixed or random-effects models based on heterogeneity assessments. With a total number of 490 participants, ITT showed significant improvements in the six or 10-minute walk test (MD = 45.07m, P < 0.000001), quadriceps strength (MD = 0.07 Kg, P < 0.0001), range of motion (ROM) flexion (MD = 4.29, P = 0.03), isometric knee flexion (MD =2.32, P=0.04), SF-36 physical component (MD = 1.19, P <,0.0001), stair test (MD = -2.01, P = 0.01), timed up and go test (MD = -1.12, P = 0.02), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score (MD = -8.43, P = 0.002). Conversely, CTT showed better results in isometric knee extension (MD = 3.45, P = 0.02). No significant differences were found in ROM extension or visual analog score (VAS) pain scores. Preoperative ITT demonstrates overall superior outcomes compared to CTT for total knee arthroplasty patients. ITT significantly improved various functional and patient-reported outcomes, including walking capacity, quadriceps strength, range of motion, and quality of life measures. However, CTT showed superiority in isometric knee extension. We recommend implementing preoperative ITT protocols for TKA patients while acknowledging the need for further research to optimize exercise specifics, frequency, and duration for optimal results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.