ArticleCureus2024
A Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Skills Between Novices and Experts: How to Steepen the Learning Curve.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and aim Laparoscopic surgery has revolutionized the field of surgery over the past few decades. The learning curve in laparoscopy is known to be slow, flat, and complex. This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of laparoscopic skills, specifically focusing on suturing, knot tying, and needle handling, between novices and experts. The purpose is to objectively quantify the disparities in skill proficiency, identify specific areas needing improvement in training curricula, and contribute to the development of more effective training methodologies for emerging laparoscopic surgeons. Methods Residents from different specialties and institutions had their laparoscopic training and evaluation sessions recorded during their curriculum and compared with the performance of experienced surgeons from the Hôtel-Dieu de France University Hospital (Beirut, LBN) during live surgeries. This comparative study was based on the universally recognized Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) score and an assessment of a detailed set of laparoscopic skills and techniques used during needle handling and knot tying. Results Twenty-one tasks performed by novices and 11 tasks performed by experts were considered. A significant difference was found in the GOALS score between the two groups (experts: 23.4/25; novices: 15.9/25). Moreover, a statistically significant difference was found to be present in favor of the experts in the following skills/techniques: using thread handling and forceps rotation for needle manipulation, laying the needle on a fixed driver arm before grasping it, using needle curvature for knot tying, using upward-facing forceps convexity when tying, using an open thread loop before tying, thread handling capacity, knot tying capacity, and number of needle skills performed per task. Conclusion This study demonstrates that many micro-steps in laparoscopic suturing are more prevalent among expert surgeons than among trainees. Incorporating these micro-steps into training could significantly accelerate learning curves, enabling trainees to refine their skills more efficiently and keep pace with the latest surgical advancements in their specialties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.