ArticleCureus2024
Personalized Cutoffs for the Diagnosis of Neutropenic Fever Based on Patients' Baseline Body Temperature: A Retrospective Pilot Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The management of neutropenic fever patients remains challenging. Patients' individual baseline body temperature may provide diagnostic and prognostic value. Methods This study is a retrospective analysis of 92 adults admitted for neutropenic fever to model the length of stay (LOS) and the ability to find a definitive diagnosis using the deviation of patients' temperature on admission from their outpatient baseline, acuity on admission, neutropenia level and persistence, fever persistence, and patients' age. Results Patients' average baseline body temperature was 36.7°C+/-0.3°C - the body temperature had to be over four standard deviations above the baseline to reach the gold standard fever threshold of 38.0°C. Their average fever on admission was 38.1°C. Fever etiologies were identified in 48%, and all constituted infections. Multiple regression modelling demonstrated that a longer LOS of >3 days was predicted by larger deviation from baseline body temperature at admission and by fever persistence at 72 hours post-admission, after correcting for the persistence of severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <500) at 72 hours, age, neutropenia level, and need for intensive care unit admission. A similar model could not predict the ability to identify a fever-explaining diagnosis. Conclusions This pilot project provides support for the use of patients' individual baseline body temperature rather than a pre-established universal fever cutoff in the diagnosis of neutropenic fever. Using a personalized cutoff is expected to avoid missing cases. Further, deviation from patients' baseline body temperature at admission could serve as a predictor for the hospital LOS, which can serve as a potential tool for hospital bed management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.