ReviewCureus2024
Unraveling Anatomical Variations of the Acromioclavicular Joint: A Comprehensive Inquiry Into Their Impact on Instability.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The acromioclavicular (AC) joint, an essential element in the complex biomechanics of the shoulder, displays a diverse range of anatomical variations among individuals. This review aimed to study and present these variations. A detailed search was conducted on the PubMed medical database by using the terms "acromioclavicular joint variations". Initially, 108 articles were retrieved and, after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, only 11 articles were found eligible. Eight more papers were selected from the citations in those 108 papers. As a result, a total of 19 papers and studies were used for the final analysis. This comprehensive review highlights the existence of a wide range of anatomical variations, concerning joint alignment, dimensions of articular surfaces, ligament arrangements, as well as acromion types and joint angles. Gender-related differences in joint dimensions and angles, as well as comparisons between intact groups and patients with rotator cuff tears, are also examined. Delving into the intricacies of anatomical variations is essential in comprehending how these differences may contribute to joint instability. Through a synthesis of anatomical studies, clinical observations, and biomechanical analyses, this narrative review provides an up-to-date assessment of the existing information regarding the AC joint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.