Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39759612›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Newer Biomarkers in Gallbladder Carcinoma: A Scoping Review.

Amitabh Kumar Upadhyay, Deb Sanjay Nag, Sanghamitra Jena, Neetesh Sinha, Dona Lodh

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Navigating Drug Discovery for Myhre Syndrome: The Complexity of a Multisystemic Rare Disease.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amitabh Kumar UpadhyayMedical Oncology, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur, IND.
Deb Sanjay NagAnesthesiology, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur, IND.
Sanghamitra JenaSurgical Oncology, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur, IND.
Neetesh SinhaSurgical Oncology, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur, IND.
Dona LodhAnesthesiology, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarkers have the potential to play a crucial role in managing gallbladder cancer post-surgery. They can identify patients more likely to experience a recurrence, allowing oncologists to tailor a more intensive surveillance plan and consider additional therapies. Some biomarkers can even predict how well a patient will respond to specific chemotherapy or targeted treatments. By monitoring these biomarkers, clinicians can track how effective the ongoing treatment is and detect any signs of early recurrence. Various biomarkers, like tumor markers, genetic markers, and genomic and epigenetic markers, are being investigated. The goal is to find the most reliable and accurate biomarkers to enhance patient care and outcomes. Integrating biomarker data into treatment plans can help personalize therapy and make better informed decisions. By identifying which patients are likely to benefit from specific treatments, biomarkers have the potential to improve long-term survival rates significantly. This scoping review discusses newer biomarkers in gallbladder carcinoma; some of them are in clinical use, while most of them are used in research settings. This provides a broad insight to practicing clinicians about the present biomarkers and the futuristic biomarkers.

Indexed as

biomarkerscarcinomaepigenomicsgallbladder neoplasmsgenetic markersgenomicslocalneoplasm recurrenceprognosistumor

Identifiers

PMID39759612
PMCPMC11700022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.