ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2024
Learning delays through gradients and structure: emergence of spatiotemporal patterns in spiking neural networks.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Lightweight Keyword Spotting Method Using a Convolutional Spiking Neural Network with Learnable Synaptic Delays.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Three factor delay learning rules for spiking neural networks.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Efficient event-based delay learning in spiking neural networks.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a Spiking Neural Network (SNN) model that incorporates learnable synaptic delays through two approaches: per-synapse delay learning via Dilated Convolutions with Learnable Spacings (DCLS) and a dynamic pruning strategy that also serves as a form of delay learning. In the latter approach, the network dynamically selects and prunes connections, optimizing the delays in sparse connectivity settings. We evaluate both approaches on the Raw Heidelberg Digits keyword spotting benchmark using Backpropagation Through Time with surrogate gradients. Our analysis of the spatio-temporal structure of synaptic interactions reveals that, after training, excitation and inhibition group together in space and time. Notably, the dynamic pruning approach, which employs DEEP R for connection removal and RigL for reconnection, not only preserves these spatio-temporal patterns but outperforms per-synapse delay learning in sparse networks. Our results demonstrate the potential of combining delay learning with dynamic pruning to develop efficient SNN models for temporal data processing. Moreover, the preservation of spatio-temporal dynamics throughout pruning and rewiring highlights the robustness of these features, providing a solid foundation for future neuromorphic computing applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.