Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39759575›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025

Association between HPV vaccination and cervical screening policy changes and cervical cancer incidence and grade-3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia incidence in England, 2006-2020: a population-based trends analysis.

Milena Falcaro, Alejandra Castañón, Busani Ndlela, Peter Sasieni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Towards primary prevention of multiple sclerosis.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. A Field-Deployable RotEx-LAMP-LFA Platform for Molecular Triage of HPV-Driven Oncogenesis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Milena FalcaroCentre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Alejandra CastañónHealth Analytics, Lane Clark & Peacock LLP, 95 Wigmore Street, London, UK.
Busani NdlelaNational Disease Registration Service (NDRS), NHS England, London, UK.
Peter SasieniCentre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Monitoring trends in diseases after the implementation of new public health interventions or policy changes is crucial for public health planning and surveillance. In this study we look at variations in rates of cervical cancer and grade-3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN3) incidence between 2006 and 2020 in England and relate them to predictions based on the changes in HPV vaccination and cervical screening policy. Methods: Using population-based registry data, we estimated incidence rates and their 95% confidence intervals for cervical cancer and CIN3 by age group and by either year of diagnosis or 1-year birth cohort. Trends were compared over time and across birth cohorts by calculating relative changes with respect to reference time points. We also tested if trends in women offered HPV vaccination were significantly different across outcomes (cervical cancer and CIN3) and age groups. To do this, we used Poisson regression with adjustments for interval censoring, overdispersion and correlation between observations. Findings: There were 5558 cancers and 164,682 cases of CIN3 from 53.4 million women-years of observation in the age group 20-29.99 years. We found no evidence of increased cervical cancer rates over the age of 26 in cohorts not offered cervical screening until age 24.5 or 25 years. Substantial and increasing reductions in CIN3s and cervical cancers were observed in the cohorts offered HPV vaccination and were consistent with an 80% (95% CI: 72.9%-87.1%) decrease in cervical neoplasia in the routine vaccination group. Interpretation: Plots against different time scales (e.g., calendar year and date of birth) may provide important insights that could otherwise be missed. Our findings are consistent with a sustained high effectiveness of the HPV immunization programme as the catch-up vaccination cohorts age. Funding: Cancer Research UK.

Indexed as

Cervical cancerCervical intraepithelial neoplasiaCohort effectsData visualisationHealth policyHPVImmunizationIncidencePapillomavirusesRatesRegistriesScreeningTrendsVaccination

Identifiers

PMID39759575
PMCPMC11697118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.