ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2024
Ultra-low dose rate brachytherapy (uLDR-BT) in treatment of patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk group prostate cancer - retrospective analysis.
Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-Term Outcomes of Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer: A 17-Year Retrospective Analysis of a Single-Center Portuguese Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Polish Brachytherapy Society clinical recommendations and expert consensus on radical high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2026Review
- Evaluation of cubic voxel effects on dose calculation for Iridium-192 high dose rate using TOPAS particle simulation.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Treatment with sole ultra-low dose rate brachytherapy (uLDR-BT) for unfavorable intermediate risk factor (IUR) group prostate cancer patients is not recommended by guidelines due to the lack of strong evidence of its effectiveness. However, there were numerous patients treated with good results with this method in older trials. Purpose of this work was to retrospectively asses effectiveness of uLDR-BT in IUR group treated in our department. Materials and methods: We performed retrospective analysis of 39 IUR prostate cancer patients treated in our department with uLDR-BT between 2015-2019. All Patients had confirmed prostate cancer in biopsy and had local staging assessed with digital rectal examination and either transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before treatment. Treatment was performed using Results: The median follow-up was 56,3 months [interquartile range (IQR): 36.9-73.4]. The mean nadir prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 0.20 ng/mL (range 0.001-1.7). The actuarial 5-year biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) was 87.02%. There was no statistically significant difference in BFFS between groups with antigen deprivation therapy (ADT) and without (p = 0.439). Analysis also showed no impact on BFFS of each intermediate group risk factors: initial PSA (iPSA) (p = 0.595). Gleason (p = 0.671) and Tumor stage (p = 0.694). There were no statistically significant differences in BFFS depending on number of those factors (p = 0.330). Conclusion: The uLDR-BT may be an effective option for selected IUR prostate cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.