Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39759554›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2024

Endothelial progenitor cells as an angiogenic biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancer.

Fadi Najjar, Hassan Alsabe, Hussein Sabbagh, Ghassan Al-Massarani, Abdulmunim Aljapawe, Nissreen Alamalla, Issraa Banat, Adnan Ikhtiar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The evaluation of serum magnesium and calcium/magnesium ratio in patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fadi NajjarBiomarkers Laboratory, Department of Radiation Medicine, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria (AECS), Damascus, Syria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6169-1576
Hassan AlsabeDivision of Thoracic Oncology, Department of Oncology, Al-Bairouni University Hospital, Damascus, Syria.
Hussein SabbaghDivision of Thoracic Oncology, Department of Oncology, Al-Bairouni University Hospital, Damascus, Syria.
Ghassan Al-MassaraniBiomarkers Laboratory, Department of Radiation Medicine, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria (AECS), Damascus, Syria.
Abdulmunim AljapaweRadiobiology Laboratory, Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), Damascus, Syria.
Nissreen AlamallaBiomarkers Laboratory, Department of Radiation Medicine, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria (AECS), Damascus, Syria.
Issraa BanatBiomarkers Laboratory, Department of Radiation Medicine, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria (AECS), Damascus, Syria.
Adnan IkhtiarRadiobiology Laboratory, Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), Damascus, Syria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Angiogenesis is mediated by endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) derived from bone-marrow. In this prospective study, we tried to investigate the clinical utility of circulating EPCs in lung cancer (LC) patients. Materials and methods: Flow cytometry technique was used to assess circulating EPCs according to the immuno-phenotype CD45 Results: The mean of baseline EPC numbers was significantly higher in LC patients than in controls (p =0.003). Pretreatment EPC values were significantly correlated with primary tumor size (p = 0.05) and tumor response (p = 0.04). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were plotted to discriminate EPC numbers between patients and controls. Using ROC analysis, the optimal cutoff value was 125 cells/mL with a sensitivity and a specificity for baseline EPCs of 76.7% and 63.3%, respectively. According to this cutoff value, basal EPC values were significantly correlated with primary tumor size (p = 0.047) and response to chemotherapy (p = 0.034). High EPC levels were significantly associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) duration (p = 0.0043 and p = 0.02, respectively). Conclusion: Increased baseline EPC values seem to be a useful biomarker for the prediction of prognosis and tumor response in LC patients. Furthermore, high EPC levels at diagnosis might be an indicator of tumor growth and longer survival in LC patients.

Indexed as

cancer biomarkerendothelial progenitor cellslung cancerprognosis

Identifiers

PMID39759554
PMCPMC11698562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.