ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2024
The Impact on Patient Prognosis of Changes to the Method of Notifying Staff About Accepting Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Our hospital is a designated emergency hospital and accepts many patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Previously, after receiving a direct call from emergency services to request acceptance of an OHCA patient, the emergency room (ER) chief nurse notified medical staff. However, this method delayed ER preparations, so a Code Blue system (CB) was introduced in which the pending arrival of an OHCA patient was broadcast throughout the hospital. Methods: In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the impact of introducing CB at our hospital on OHCA patient prognosis to examine whether the introduction of CB is clinically meaningful. We compared consecutive cases treated before introduction of the CB (March 3, 2022, to March 22, 2023) with those treated afterwards (March 23, 2023, to July 23, 2024). Results: A total of 30 cases per group were included. The mean number of medical staff present at admissions increased significantly from 5.4 ± 0.6 to 15.0 ± 3.0 (P < 0.001). Although not statistically significant, the introduction of the CB increased the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate from 20% to 30%, survival to discharge rate from 3% to 10%, and social reintegration rate from 0% to 3%. ROSC occurred in 15 patients. Among OHCA patients with cardiac disease, the ROSC rate tended to increase from 0% to 43% (P = 0.055). In addition, in OHCA patients with cardiac disease whose electrocardiogram initially showed ventricular fibrillation or pulseless electrical activity, the ROSC rate increased from 0% to 100%. ROSC tended to be influenced by the total number of staff and physicians present and the number of staff such as medical clerks, clinical engineers, and radiology technicians (P = 0.095, 0.076, 0.088, respectively). Conclusions: Introduction of a CB may increase the ROSC rate and the number of patients surviving to discharge. It also appears to improve the quality of medical care by quickly gathering all necessary medical staff so that they can perform their predefined roles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.