Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39759471›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2025

Predicting incident dementia in community-dwelling older adults using primary and secondary care data from electronic health records.

Konstantin Georgiev, Yiqing Wang, Andrew Conkie, Annie Sinclair, Vyron Christodoulou, Saleh Seyedzadeh, Malcolm Price, Ann Wales, Nicholas L Mills, Susan D Shenkin and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Konstantin GeorgievBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4736-4039
Yiqing WangBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK.
Andrew ConkieRed Star, Glasgow G64 2BS, UK.
Annie SinclairRed Star, Glasgow G64 2BS, UK.
Vyron ChristodoulouThe Data Lab Innovation Centre, Bayes Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9BT, UK.
Saleh SeyedzadehThe Data Lab Innovation Centre, Bayes Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9BT, UK.
Malcolm PriceThe Data Lab Innovation Centre, Bayes Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9BT, UK.
Ann WalesDigital Health & Care Innovation Centre, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1RD, UK.
Nicholas L MillsBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0533-7991
Susan D ShenkinAgeing and Health Research Group and Advanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, Edinburgh BioQuarter, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UX, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7375-4776
Joanne McPeakeThe Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK.
Jacques D FleuriotArtificial Intelligence and its Applications Institute, School of Informatics, Newington, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, UK.
Atul AnandBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6428-4554

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting risk of future dementia is essential for primary prevention strategies, particularly in the era of novel immunotherapies. However, few studies have developed population-level prediction models using existing routine healthcare data. In this longitudinal retrospective cohort study, we predicted incident dementia using primary and secondary care health records at 5, 10 and 13 years in 144 113 Scottish older adults who were dementia-free prior to 1st April 2009. Gradient-boosting (XGBoost) prediction models were trained on two feature subsets: data-driven (using all 171 extracted variables) and clinically supervised (22 curated variables). We used a random-stratified internal validation set to rank top predictors in each model, assessing performance stratified by age and socioeconomic deprivation. Predictions were stratified into 10 equally sized risk deciles and ranked by response rate. Over 13 years of follow-up, 11 143 (8%) patients developed dementia. The data-driven models achieved marginally better precision-recall area-under-the-curve scores of 0.18, 0.26 and 0.30 compared to clinically supervised models with scores of 0.17, 0.27 and 0.29 for incident dementia at 5, 10 and 13 years, respectively. The clinically supervised model achieved comparable specificity 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-0.88] and sensitivity (0.55, 95% CI 0.53-0.57) to the data-driven model for prediction at 13 years. The most important model features were age, deprivation and frailty, measured by a modified electronic frailty index excluding known cognitive deficits. Model precision was consistent across socioeconomic deprivation quintiles but lower in younger-onset (<70 years) dementia cases. At 13 years, dementia was diagnosed in 32% of the population classified as highest risk with 40% of individuals in this group below the age of 80. Personalized estimates of future dementia risk from routinely collected healthcare data could influence risk factor modification and help to target brain imaging and novel immunotherapies in selected individuals with pre-symptomatic disease.

Indexed as

geriatric carehealth servicesmachine learningprimary preventionrisk identification

Identifiers

PMID39759471
PMCPMC11697165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.