Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39759442›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychological medicine2025

Facial Emotion Recognition Ability in Individuals with Remitted Schizophrenia in Comparison to Healthy Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Shaily Mina, Sonali Chaudhary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychological medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shaily MinaDept. of Psychiatry, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7287-0791
Sonali ChaudharyDept. of Psychiatry, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Facial emotion recognition is one of the significant domains of social cognition that underlie social interactions. These deficits can influence the functional outcome in individuals with schizophrenia by impairing judgment toward others and reducing their capability to function. We aimed to assess the facial emotion recognition deficits in individuals with schizophrenia in comparison to healthy individuals and find their association with clinical and demographic profiles. Methods: This cross-sectional study compared individuals with schizophrenia in a stable remitted phase of illness to an age, gender, and education-matched healthy population, including 30 participants in each group. The assessment was done using Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE-III), AIIMS Facial Toolbox for Emotion Recognition (AFTER), and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Intergroup comparison was done using the Independent sample Results: The schizophrenia group performed significantly worse than healthy controls on identifying positive and negative emotions except for happiness. The time to recognize emotion was also found to be significantly more in the schizophrenia group than in controls. Also, significant cognitive deficits were found in the schizophrenia group in comparison to the healthy population. Negative emotions were found to be more correlated to psychopathology. Conclusion: Individuals with schizophrenia appear to have a stable deficit in facial emotion recognition (more in negative emotions). Cognitive deficits are seen more in individuals with schizophrenia as compared to healthy populations, even in their stable phase of illness.

Indexed as

cognitionEmotionfacial emotionpsychosisschizophreniasocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID39759442
PMCPMC11694268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.