ArticleJACC. Advances2025
Multimodal Fusion Artificial Intelligence Model to Predict Risk for MACE and Myocarditis in Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- PRIME 2.0: Proposed Requirements for Cardiovascular Imaging-Related Multimodal-AI Evaluation: An Updated Checklist.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2026Guideline
- Prediction models for immune checkpoint inhibitor-related cardiovascular toxicity: a systematic review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning for myocarditis diagnosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a systematic review, diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis, and comparison with human physicians.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Mapping the global landscape of research on immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated cardiotoxicity: A quantitative and visualized bibliometric study (2016-2025).Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- A narrative review of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related cardiotoxicity in lung cancer: mechanisms, risk stratification, and clinical management.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Predicting immune checkpoint inhibitor cardiotoxicity using machine learning: a systematic review of model performance and methodological quality.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence across the cardiovascular diagnostic pathway: a case-based narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Reimagining cardiac care with AI, LLMs, blockchain, and metaverse.Global cardiology science & practice · 2026Review
- Inhibitory receptor states, immune homeostasis and the benefit-risk boundary of cancer checkpoint blockade.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Deep learning for cardiovascular disease: a comprehensive review of detection and risk forecasting.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated arrhythmias: clinical challenges, artificial intelligence-enhanced monitoring, and management strategies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Multi-Omics for Predicting Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response and Resistance.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiogram for the Detection and Management of Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiotoxicity.Cancer innovation · 2025Article
- Biomarkers in Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy: Current Evidence and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- Breaking Barriers in Cardiovascular and Cancer Care With Multimodal AI.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has dramatically improved the prognosis for some cancers but can be associated with myocarditis, adverse cardiovascular events, and mortality. Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict the increased likelihood for the development of ICI-related myocarditis and adverse cardiovascular events. Methods: Cancer patients treated with ICI at a tertiary institution from 2011 to 2022 were reviewed. Baseline characteristics, laboratory values, electrocardiograms, and cardiovascular clinical outcomes were extracted. A composite outcome of ICI-related myocarditis and major adverse cardiovascular events (transient ischemic attack/stroke, new diagnosis of heart failure, myocardial infarction, and cardiac death) was used to develop a multimodal joint fusion AI model by combining baseline tabular data with electrocardiogram (ECG) in a single end-to-end model. ECG data were parsed using 1-D convolution and tubular data using multilayer perceptron. Results: Of 2,258 cancer patients who had ICI therapy and troponin measurement (mean age 68.5 ± 11.5 years, 59.7% male), the composite of cardiovascular clinical adverse events, including ICI-related myocarditis and major adverse cardiovascular events, occurred in 264 (11.7%) unique patients, with 428 events overall (including 59 [3%] ICI-related myocarditis events and 59 [3%] cardiac deaths). The proposed joint fusion model outperformed individual ECG and baseline electronic medical record data and laboratory value models with an area under the operating characteristics curve of 0.72 (0.64 true positive rate and 0.98 negative predictive value). Conclusion: A multimodal fusion AI model to predict myocarditis and adverse cardiovascular events in cancer patients starting ICI therapy had good prognostic performance. It may have clinical utility in identifying at-risk patients who may benefit from closer surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.