ArticleJACC. Advances2025
Revascularization During Cardiac Arrest While Receiving Extracorporeal Life Support in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Without Sustained Return of Spontaneous Circulation Under Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Phenotype-Oriented Descriptive Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Coronary angiography in cardiac arrest patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026Article
- Management of persistent shockable rhythms during cardiac arrest: a national survey from the REVIVE group (REVIVE-2).Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has allowed patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) to receive primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); they were previously ineligible. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to clarify the characteristics and outcomes of patients with OHCA secondary to AMI who underwent primary PCI during refractory cardiac arrest despite ECPR. Methods: Patients with AMI and OHCA aged ≥18 years who underwent PCI with ECPR in 2013 to 2018 were identified from a multicenter ECPR registry in Japan. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. We also assessed possible predictors of survival to discharge using mixed effects logistic regression to account for group differences among facilities. Results: Among 671 patients with AMI and OHCA who underwent PCI with ECPR from 30 institutions, 251 (37%) patients had refractory cardiac arrest despite ECPR initiation and subsequently underwent primary PCI. Following coronary reperfusion, 64.9% (163/251) of patients achieved the sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 21.1% (53/251) survived, and 10.4% (26/251) had favorable neurological status at hospital discharge. Multivariable analysis revealed that intermittent prehospital ROSC (OR: 5.22; 95% CI: 1.54-17.79), shorter time to ECPR initiation (OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.82-0.98), and postprocedural TIMI flow grade 3 (OR: 5.08; 95% CI: 1.50-17.22) are significantly associated with survival to hospital discharge. Conclusions: Among patients with AMI and refractory OHCA treated with ECPR, one-third did not have sustained ROSC prior to PCI. Of those, two-thirds achieved sustained ROSC following reperfusion and one-fifth survived to discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.