ArticleHeliyon2024
Defining conceptual artefacts to manage and design simplicities in complex adaptive systems.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling simplexity: A new paradigm for understanding complex adaptive systems and driving technological innovation.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2025Review
- Theoretical Analysis of Low-Frequency Sound Absorption Owing to the Vibration of Lightweight Powder Using a 1D Beam Model.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Additive Manufacturing of Alumina-Based Ceramic Structures by Vat Photopolymerization: A Review of Strategies for Improving Shaping Accuracy and Properties.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- AI-Powered Very-High-Cycle Fatigue Control: Optimizing Microstructural Design for Selective Laser Melted Ti-6Al-4V.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Durability of Cutting Tools Obtained by U-FAST Technology in Particleboard Machining.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concept of Simplexity has emerged several times in many discourses within different scientific domains: it somehow refers to the intertwined nature of Simplicity and Complexity. To the eye of the scientist beholder, any of these contributions renders different facets. None of those is negligible nor seems to be superior. Starting from this consideration, this paper uses a recent Design Science Research based method to develop a conceptual artefact allowing the entire realm of Complexity Sciences to unravel the Complexity of Simplexity. By moving through an in-depth systematic literature review, this research mined the nuances of Simplexity's meaning from several different research domains throughout seventy years, and then distilled those nuances. The resulting conceptual artefacts are possibly useful any time there is the need for dealing with Complexity - from the design of cyber-socio-technical systems to the analysis of protein networks - paving the way for a shared language for Psychologists, Neuro-linguists, Designers, Resilience Engineers, Biologists, and other Complexity Scientists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.