ArticleHeliyon2024
An optimized public opinion communication system in social media networks based on K-means cluster analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Study on charging strategy of wireless rechargeable sensor networks based on dynamic inhomogeneous clustering.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Quantification and Evolution of Online Public Opinion Heat Considering Interactive Behavior and Emotional Conflict.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposes a public opinion monitoring model that combines the K-means clustering algorithm with Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to enhance the accuracy and effectiveness of public opinion monitoring on social media. The model's performance across various dissemination indicators is studied in detail. Through experiments conducted on social media datasets, the study comprehensively evaluates the model from four dimensions: dissemination speed, scope, depth, and sentiment dissemination effectiveness. The experimental results indicate that the proposed optimization model excels in multiple areas, particularly in dissemination depth and sentiment dissemination effectiveness. Specifically, in the three dimensions of dissemination speed, the proposed model achieves scores of 4.3, 4.2, and 4.4 in initial dissemination speed, decay speed, and peak dissemination speed, respectively. In the dimensions of user coverage, geographic coverage, and platform coverage under dissemination scope, the model scores 4.4, 4.5, and 4.3, demonstrating a broad dissemination capability. Additionally, in the dimensions of hierarchical dissemination depth and key node influence within dissemination depth, the model scores 4.3 and 4.5, indicating excellent performance in multi-level dissemination and key node activation. In sentiment dissemination effectiveness, the model receives scores of 4.4, 4.5, and 4.4 in emotional tendency change, polarity distribution, and diffusion intensity, showcasing its advantages in sentiment classification and dissemination. Sensitivity analysis further validates the model's sensitivity to parameter settings, with experiments showing that reasonable adjustments to parameters such as the K value, PSO inertia weight, and learning factors can reduce the Sum of Squared Errors to 3209.72. Meanwhile, it can improve clustering purity to 0.822 and raise the Rand index to 0.623. Therefore, this study offers an efficient and reliable solution for public opinion monitoring on social media, providing valuable reference significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.