Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39759354›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

An optimized public opinion communication system in social media networks based on K-means cluster analysis.

Mingchao Qi, JunQiang Zhao, Yan Feng

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mingchao QiXinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, 453000, China.
JunQiang ZhaoXinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, 453000, China.
Yan FengXinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, 453000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study proposes a public opinion monitoring model that combines the K-means clustering algorithm with Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to enhance the accuracy and effectiveness of public opinion monitoring on social media. The model's performance across various dissemination indicators is studied in detail. Through experiments conducted on social media datasets, the study comprehensively evaluates the model from four dimensions: dissemination speed, scope, depth, and sentiment dissemination effectiveness. The experimental results indicate that the proposed optimization model excels in multiple areas, particularly in dissemination depth and sentiment dissemination effectiveness. Specifically, in the three dimensions of dissemination speed, the proposed model achieves scores of 4.3, 4.2, and 4.4 in initial dissemination speed, decay speed, and peak dissemination speed, respectively. In the dimensions of user coverage, geographic coverage, and platform coverage under dissemination scope, the model scores 4.4, 4.5, and 4.3, demonstrating a broad dissemination capability. Additionally, in the dimensions of hierarchical dissemination depth and key node influence within dissemination depth, the model scores 4.3 and 4.5, indicating excellent performance in multi-level dissemination and key node activation. In sentiment dissemination effectiveness, the model receives scores of 4.4, 4.5, and 4.4 in emotional tendency change, polarity distribution, and diffusion intensity, showcasing its advantages in sentiment classification and dissemination. Sensitivity analysis further validates the model's sensitivity to parameter settings, with experiments showing that reasonable adjustments to parameters such as the K value, PSO inertia weight, and learning factors can reduce the Sum of Squared Errors to 3209.72. Meanwhile, it can improve clustering purity to 0.822 and raise the Rand index to 0.623. Therefore, this study offers an efficient and reliable solution for public opinion monitoring on social media, providing valuable reference significance.

Indexed as

Cluster analysisData miningK-means algorithmNetwork public opinionSocial media

Identifiers

PMID39759354
PMCPMC11699079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.